Over four years have elapsed since the Federal Circuit first held that federal courts possess exclusive jurisdiction over patent legal malpractice claims. In Immunocept, LLC v. Fulbright & Jaworski, LLP, 504 F.3d 1281 (Fed. Cir. 2007), the court ruled that patent claim scope issues alleged in patent legal malpractice claim raise substantial federal issues. Similarly,… Continue Reading
Monthly Archives: January 2012
About Us
Lane Powell PC offers a comprehensive intellectual property practice across all key areas of patents and copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and Internet law.
Know the Landscape™
Topics
Stay Connected
Subscribe by email
Recent Updates
- Is it Time for Federal Courts to Stop Exercising Jurisdiction Over Patent Legal Malpractice Claims?
- The Perils of Patent Prosecution Delegation: A Cautionary Tale
- Emerging Fissures in Exercising Federal Jurisdiction Over Patent Legal Malpractice Cases
- The Jurisdictional Power of the “Case-Within-A-Case” Doctrine in Patent Legal Malpractice Litigation
- “It’s Too Late Baby, Now It’s Too Late Though We Really Did Try to Make It”: The Perils of Missing Patent Litigation Deadlines
- How a “Plague” of Inequitable Conduct Charges Curiously Became a “Scourge” and Why We Should Guard Against the Use of Pejorative Patent Terminology
- The Sangamon River as Abe Lincoln’s Mother of Invention
- Have You Been “Hired,” But Not “Retained”? and Other Life Lessons from Davis v. Brouse McDowell
- Jury Notes and Special Verdicts in Patent Cases: A Case Study in Jury Comprehension
- Tracking Down the Elusive Obviousness Special Verdict Form
- Twin Challenges in Drafting a Viable Patent Legal Malpractice Complaint
- Exclusive Federal Court Jurisdiction Over Patent Legal Malpractice Claims: Where Are We?
- The Ethics of Patent Litigation Forum Shopping
- The Ethical Obligation to Self-Report Patent Legal Malpractice